The Secret Weapon

bush_punch.jpg

In my normal life, I work on in a team of engineers that are based all over the globe, in point of fact, I am one of only two Americans in my little group. The result of this situation is I'm often asked to help translate the nature of American life to my co-workers.

While Americans are often accused of being ignorant of the rest of the world, I'm hear to tell you that the rest of the world doesn't know a thing about America or Americans. This is in spite of how we spew our culture over the world like an open and out of control 5 inch firehose. What most of the world actually knows about America and Americans could fit into a small monkeys fist.

In the three years since I joined this team, we've covered items from "pick up trucks", homebuilt aircraft to gun ownership. But the one thing that most of the Euros and the Asia Pacific folks dont get is:

George W. Bush.

Well, for that matter the whole method and practice of Governance in the United States is a mystery to the people of the world. I get quiet exasperated trying to explain "separation of powers', 'federal vs. state powers' and 'constitutional law'. The idea that our system of government is designed to ensure that it doesnt work very well, is simply beyond them. When I explain that the "Bill Of Rights" does not in fact give you any rights, but actually limits the powers of government, that all rights are believed to be yours to begin with and that most of what the constitution does is limit, form and shape government, and that it does not actually say in any explicit language " you have this right or that one". It does tell every one "government can go this far and no further" on a number of subjects.

I also tell them if you want to start a fight between any two random Americans, just propose to them that you want to change the Constitution, and then stand back. All Americans feel the Constitution is theirs. To Americans, the cornerstone of our law is more akin to deed of trust than a holy tract.

Most of the Euros expect that the office of the President is like a "Super-Prime-Minister". When I explain that the President is just the president, and he is only the executive officer of one of the three branches of government and very often the legislative branch is under the control of the party in opposition to the Presidents party, they think I must be kidding.

Divided Government, an American Practice and Tradition for over 200 years, but a complete mystery to the rest of the world.

When I explain that the President gets to propose a budget, but congress actually sets the bill into being, but then the President still has to sign the budget into law, they are stunned. When I explain that the President can talk foreign policy and treaty law all he wants with the leaders of the world but the Senate still has to ratify all treaties, they dont know what to say.

"Wait! - The President can send the Secretary of State over to sign a peace treaty and the senate might NOT ratify it"?

Sure. No problem.

Well, that doesnt work very well.

That's precisely why it was designed that way. It takes a tremendous amount of collaboration, cooperation and concession to get anything done at all in the United States. On the whole, Americans would prefer that nothing get done slowly over something bad getting done quickly.

I recently had someone get "red faced furious" at President Bush and his not signing the Kyoto Treaty. When I explained that President Bush could sign on tommorrow and nothing would change, as the Senate is unlikely to ratify the treaty in any form, no matter how its presented. The Senate had already voted down the treaty 98-0 once before. This person simply didn't believe me, I then asked them why then didn't President Clinton sign on to Kyoto if it were so easy? He of course, didnt have an answer. He has always been told it was Only Bush that was stopping it. When I told him that it was actually American voters who had largely stopped Kyoto, he simply could not understand how it was so, and yet, it clearly was.

Americans might be largely from Europe, but Americans are not European. We have a very different way of looking at the world. In this one example we see a very clear difference between European thinking and American thinking.

All children in America are raised with a lesson that is based on a well intentioned myth, but it is but one of many small things that binds us together and yet makes us different from Europeans.

All American are all raised with the idea that:

"Someday kid, you too could grow up to be the President of the United States".

We are told tales of the Great President Lincoln and how he was raised in a log cabin, but grew to become one of our greatest presidents and a truly great man. We are told of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and how he was not stopped by being infirmed by polio to be one of the greatest men of all time. We are all raised to believe that we too could be President. I dont think I've ever hear a European tell me that when they were a kid they were told:

"Someday Son, you too can grow up to be Prime Minister!"

One of the unintended consequences of this myth is to make every American look at the person who is President or the person who wants to be President, and then ask themselves:

"Does this guy think he's better than me"?

Americans don't believe that there is a class of people who should lead them. Americans infact tend to loathe and despise any person who feels that they "Deserve to be in charge!". We dont see a "lord and master" or messiah in the office of President, we see a man, someone who's just like us, even when nothing could be further from the truth, thats what we like to see. That's what we want to see. When Military leaders of aplomb run for President, like Macarthur or more recently Wesley Clark, we give them the look askance and know that no matter how qualified they might be as executive officers, the basic fact exists that any man who wants to be President had better be "one of us" and thus their lofty ambitions are defeated, not by great armies, but by the coffee klatches of the Iowa caucuses and the snows of New Hampshire primaries. With only very rare exceptions, Generals are simply not "one of us". For some reason I cant yet fathom, Admirals are never in the running at all for President, either they are just smarter than Generals or they dont like the cut in pay and lack of status that will come with the step down from being an Admiral to becoming the President. It is a mystery.

Americans also don't look to long term political life as an example of a good potential Presidental resume as much as we see someone who may have feathered their nest at the cost of the taxpayer. With the exception of the Kennedy family, Americans dont trust the "Family Business' approach to politics as the Bush Brothers have found. The Kennedys are a true phenomenon that oddly proves my point as Kennedys are a family who, while rich, are also a members of a once persecuted religious minority who did not always enjoy the freedoms that they do today. It was the Kennedy family ascendance that brought an end to so much anti-catholic attitudes in the United States, as a result you could also say that Kennedys were also "one of us", even though they were in a very rarified part of the "wealth pyramid". No matter where they came from they always made sure to make it about "us" and not "them". I think their familiy business franchise is on hard times as of late, but I dont think that should take away from some of the truly great things they did in the past.

Americans will give the President a great deal of freedom to do his job, so long as the President is perceived as being not on "his side", but on "our side". By most measures of success to modern presidencies, FDR cannot be seen as a wholly successful as he presided over one of the worst situations any President has ever seen. He was accused of trying to pack the Supreme Court, which had he been perceived as doing it for any other reason than what he felt was best for the country, he would have been out of office within 90 days. The economic situation was probably made worse by many of his policies, but he was forgiven by Americans because throughout the nightmare of the Great Depression because he was clearly doing it for no other reason that to try to make things better. FDR provided a beacon of guidance and leadership in an otherwise horribly dark time. If it were up to todays 'green eye shades" metrics like job reports and deficits, FDR would not have survived 18 months as President. He survived and in some ways thrived, until he died in office in 1945. If he had lived, I have no doubt he could have run and won a 5th Term in 1948. He was always optimistic and spoke only of Americas greatness, not its failures. In FDRs day the theme music for his party was "Happy Days are Here Again", todays Democrat party is "Up Against the Wall Redneck M**F**cker!" , and yet they wonder why they keep losing prominence in elections.

FDR is not considered a 'Great Man' and a 'Great President' for what he did for himself, He is considered a 'Great President' for providing leadership and direction at a dark time in the nations history. Americans respect a leader, even when things are going badly for the man and for the nation. Lincoln presided over the bloodiest war in the nations history, one that he personally had a great deal to do with the war getting started. The south seceeded largely as a result of Lincoln becoming President. The Civil War was horribly managed and could have been over much sooner had it been under better management by a more capable executive. It wasnt untill the Civil War was nearly over, that the people who elected him for his first term begin to think of him as a truly great President.

When people talk about Americans today not being loved in the world, I often remind myself that there was a time when Americans did not even love themselves.

Americans will on occasion take risks with their choice of who should be President. We accept amateurs to the office of President, such as Ulysses S. Grant, Harry Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower. If fact, most presidents have very little politcal life prior to becoming President, On average, 10 years of public service.

In modern times, Bill Clinton survived challenge after challenge largely because of nothing else except the good will of a majority of Americans. He was always perceived to be "just one of us".

Which brings us back to "Our Boy George..."

Americans tend not to give you too much credit if your daddy is is a "great man" and we dont hold it too much against you if he was a failure (Clinton)as we are all aware that no one gets to pick their parents or family ( Roger Clinton/ Billy Carter, the list goes on...). No matter where you are from and no matter what advantages or disadvantages you have, Americans want to know that you have done something significant and "on your own". We also accept people to the Presidency who have been failures ( Grant, Truman and yes, George W. Bush ) but we have no tolerance for negativity and defeatism (Carter).

The Secret Weapon of George W. Bush is that he has successfully made himself into being seen as one of us. We see a man who on September 11th had one thing that FDR did not have, a video camera in his face looking for any sign of human weakness. What that camera captured was a man who reacted calmly and effectively in the face of an unspeakable horror. In that few minutes in Florida, he had no way of knowing that this was just a couple of aircraft or that there werent 100 more on their way to hit every major city. He had no way of knowing if it was being done in concert with Chinese Nuclear submarines just off the coast, ready to launch missles to decapitate his government and this great nation. None of us knew. A certain porcine filmmaker wants to make that moment into a moment of ridicule and derision, but what I see when I see that moment is a man, one of us, faced with a nation suddenly gone from peace to war in the blink of an eye, with an unknown and possibly very powerful enemy, looking back at an audience of children who until a moment before had all thought that all that would happen on that day is they would get to tell their parents they sat with the president at school. Instead, for the rest of their lives they will tell their families for generations to come that they were in the very room where the President was told that "We are at War".

We often think about that moment in terms of what the kids saw, but we dont stop to think about what the President saw on that day. He had no way of knowing if that particular classroom of children would be affected directly by the war that was now clearly underway. All those kids had dressed for school in peacetime, but before their lunch recess, they would be in wartime. This war would begin here and be fought here at home. For the first time in generations, America itself, had become a battlefield.

They sat their looking at him and he at them, and I know as a father myself, he looked at every one of those kids and said to himself "Oh good lord, they are all so young..."

He didnt panic, he didnt run out of the room, he didnt cry, and I'm sure he wanted to do all of those things. Instead, he patiently waited for the Secret Service to clear the route, excused himself politely and went about his job, mindful that how well he did it would be reflected in the eyes of those kids on that day.

He could have made the whole event about himself, but George knows that there are more important things in the world than his own ego. The most important things in the world, were in that class, looking right at him from their desks.

The Secret Weapon of George W. Bush is the nature of a guy who can laugh at himself and knows that his wife is really the better part of himself. The Secret Weapon of George W. Bush is a guy who knows himself well enough to know whats right and wrong without having to take a poll. The Secret Weapon of George W. Bush is the common sense to know that Terrorism is something to be ended, not tolerated as a nuisance.

In last Fridays debate, at the end of the debate the audience of 'undecided' voters , voted clearly their intent by walking to George W. Bush and his lovely wife Laura and waited to have their picture taken. The President and his wife were mobbed, while the other candidate was largely by himself.

The audience of the people of Missouri, simply felt they could walk up to have their hats and t-shirts signed and their hands shook by a guy named George.

Who just happened to be - The President of the United States.

Epilogue:

I've had the hardest time convincing the Euros how young most parts of the western US actually is. For example, they all know LA to be a big bustling city, hollywood and all that. When I tell then that before WWII, LA was a city of about a million people, they thought I was kidding. When I explained that it is extremely rare to find any structures in the LA area that are older than 50 years old, except for old spanish missions, they honestly thought I was joking. Where today you find a city that spreads nonstop from santa barbara to Irvine, 60 years ago, it was a small collection of very small towns at best.

They used to get after me about how Americans dont speak more than one language, until the discovered that I speak French, German and Spanish. Then they changedthe subject and say that as a rule, Americans don't speak but one language. I then ask them how far do they have travel to find people who speak a different language. Most said less than 200 miles.

I told them we could go from the arctic circle to miami and speak nothing but English as our primary language. The fact that many Americans have to travel over 1500 miles just to find someone who doesnt speak english, it was no longer a question of American ignorance that had to be understood, but question of scale and distance that had to be understood by the Europeans.

I tell them all the time that none of them understands anything about America until they rent a car in New York and then drive to LA by way of New Orleans or Chicago. They of course ask "why we dont have trains and mass transit", I tell them we do where population density is equivalent to the way it is in Europe, but out West of the mississippi, it just doesnt make sense, (thats why we invented the airplane)! When we have a single county in California that is bigger than Holland in terms of square miles, population, GDP, it helps put things in perspective for them. When I tell them that the NY Police Department has 40,000 police officers, 250 helicopters and 50 aircraft and 125 large boats which is almost bigger than the largest army in Europe or nearly all the rest, combined! they begin to understand the scale of what we have here in the US.

When they come to America, they come like most tourists, to the big city, they see the sights, but they rarely see America. All big cities the world over are the same, its the small towns and the edge of cities where you see the differences in any part of the world. If you come to America and you havent driven for 3 hours in a straight line and not had a car pass you in either direction, you didnt really get to see the place.

When they get mad at me just for being an American, I ask them if they think we all just sprouted from the ground. They ask me "why dont Amerincas care what the world thinks?"

I then tell them the truth that the dont want to hear:

"Americans share two universal traits. First, all Americans are exiles of some sort, we are all run out, chased out, thrown out, burned out or sold out of all the other countries in the world. No American is in America because things were working well for them in the places they were from. Talk to an American long enough, and you'll always find the scalawag who escaped from the noose back in county cork, or the ancestor of the kid who was on the run from conscription in Bismarcks Germany and never saw his family again, you'll find people who are descended from people who were burned from their homes in during a progrom in Minsk, or survivors of the Armenian Genocide in Turkey. For most of us, America wasnt our first choice as much as it was our last chance.

Second, Americans share one thing in common with each other that no other person in the world can understand. While the rest of the world goes to bed at night saying "Well if things get really bad, I can always go to the States..." As Americans, we know that we have nowhere else to go. If we dont make it here, there is no where else we can go, and few places that will accept us even if we wanted to go. If America were to fall, we all know that we would not be welcome anywhere else. That, is why we fight so hard, that is why we still hold onto our patriotism and faith whem most of the world has thrown theirs away.

All Americans are enfranchised citizens, not subjects to a crown or property to a Lord. All Americans are co-owners in the greatest enterprise and longest running experiment in liberty the world has ever known. All Americans are my brothers under the flag.

I once had a guy from England tell me that what made his country great was how no matter how long I lived in England, I could never be English, but that he could come to the States and be an American right away. I told him he got it the wrong way around, that what he said is precisely why America is a great and growing country and his is not and will never be as long as he held that attitude.

That is something that no member of the European Union can ever understand.

Posted @ October 11, 2004 08:24 PM | Election 2004

Comments

Thank you. I'm sending a link to this to my sister who lives overseas. Too many Americans, regardless where they live, don't know (or don't choose to remember) how this country works.

Posted by: Donna at October 12, 2004 06:24 AM

Perhaps the most astounding idea to foreigners is that in the US (at least ostensibly) the people are the Masters and Government is the Servent. Perhaps a close second is the idea that government doesn't grant rights, particularly "negative" right, but rather they are RECOGNIZED.

Trying to explain these two concepts to foreigners is virtually impossible.

Come to think of it, it's impossible to explain to a lot of Americans, too.

Posted by: Sharpshooter at October 12, 2004 07:19 AM

Sharpshooter is spot on. It reminds me of the old joke about a European asking an American in Texas to take him to his master. The Texan spate and said, that son-of-a bitch ain't been born yet.

Posted by: Gary B at October 12, 2004 08:37 AM

Robert B. Parker's _Spenser_ displayed much the same attitude. "Who's your superior?" an irate man demanded. "I have no superior," Spenser replies, "I'm not even sure I have an equal."

Posted by: Mark J at October 12, 2004 10:20 AM

There was a science-fiction story where a guy who hated science and space travel went back in time an gave Robert A. Heinlein antibiotics for his TB, so he would remain in the Navy and never write those sci-fi novels that influenced generations of kids.

When he got back to his own time, the traveler found out....that Admiral Robert A. Heinlen (ret) was President of the USA.

Presiding over a robust space colonizing and exploiting superpower.

Posted by: N. O'Brain at October 12, 2004 01:36 PM

Excellent post. Thanks for pointing out that the rest of the world is often just as ignorant as they like to say we Americans are.

Posted by: Maureen at October 12, 2004 04:32 PM


Wow, what piece!

While I like to think that I know a good bit about geography, other cultures, and our own history and government, it did not occur to me that people outside our country had so little real knowledge of us and how the American Miracle works.

Thank you so much!

Posted by: Brett Blatchley at October 12, 2004 05:56 PM

Frank - I travelled all over Europe in the 70's and I was amazed at how little Europeans knew about the US:
1. They tended to think it was about as big as their own country. ("You're from Ohio? Do you know my friend in LA??")
2. They knew nothing of our politics (except some of the English I met.)
3. They thought I should know as much about their country as they did, when they knew little of mine (the main exceptions here were Jugoslavia, where they WANTED to learn more, and England, where they thought they knew more about us than they did, but were willing to concede that an American really should not be expected to know the details of the life of Cromwell or Richard II.

On the plus side, there was little animosity even behind the Iron Curtain.

Posted by: Oscar at October 12, 2004 08:00 PM

While Americans are often accused of being ignorant of the rest of the world, I'm hear to tell you that the rest of the world doesn't know a thing about America or Americans.

I heartily concur. Most Europeans know less about us than we do of them. My wife was G.W. Bush's secretary for 4 years in the oil business in the early 80's. Consequently We have done a gaggle of interviews with European news crews in the last year, here in the President's home of record. Their ignorance runs from the naive to the amusing to shake your head dumb. The BBC news crew was the most knowledgable we had...while the Austrians thought we'd still be packing .45's in the streets [honestly]. Nice people all...but for the "enlightened" they seemed to be cultural dim bulbs.

Posted by: Wallace-Midland, Texas at October 12, 2004 08:25 PM

This is one of the more lucid and well written observations about the American and European different experiences. It explains so much about our troubled lack of connection with our most recent ancestors. They will never "get it" or understand our core principles. I wish Europeans would read this. Fortunately for us, it matters little. Europe is entering the new age of Eurabia, and appeasement to their new masters. They have left the gene pool. It is sad but certain. The latest poll reported that 89% of Europeans would not support a war for any principle or moral stand. They are food and sustance to the Islamic facist. Little more than cattle. God help them. This article should be required reading in schools. I am copying this for my children to read.
Well done.

Posted by: David at October 13, 2004 01:52 PM

Good stuff, Frank. My compliments.

Tack on P.J. O'Rourke's concluding tirade from "Life Among The Euro-Weenies," and there's really nothing more one need say to them.

Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at October 13, 2004 03:20 PM

"All Americans are my brothers under the flag."

As one brother to another, I'd like to say that this was a great post.

You did good, Frank.


James

Posted by: James R. Rummel at October 13, 2004 09:53 PM

Spot-on, Frank. Kudos!

I learned much the same thing in Saudi - the eye-opener for them was that the American Government, which they say they hate, cannot be separated from the American people, which they proclaim they admire. Conversations lost steam after I hit 'em with this.

Life's hard. It's even harder if you're stupid. Their ignorance is their burden. We have no need for such slackers and fools.

Great post, bro -- Thanx!

Posted by: ,com at October 13, 2004 09:56 PM

Quote for the day: For most of us, America wasnt our first choice as much as it was our last chance.

Posted by: Mr. Unpronounceable at October 14, 2004 12:24 PM

You mention the problem of scale. My ex-wife's mother used to write to her family in Germany about what was going on, and had sent them a map of Texas- lived in Arlington- so they could see where they went on trips.
After we married she wrote them of us living in Oklahoma City. They wrote back that they couldn't find it on the map, was it a new city? She sent them a map of the U.S. with OKC marked. Their shocked response was 'this is all ONE country?!?'

Posted by: Mark at October 15, 2004 03:48 AM

Great post, really enjoyed reading it.

Something I thought of a long time ago was that Europeans are probably more likely to say "I am a Frenchman / Spaniard / German, and you are not", while Americans are more likely to say "I'm an American...and you can be one too!"

Posted by: Mr. Bruce at October 15, 2004 01:22 PM

you said it better than I, Mr. Bruce.

Posted by: Frank Martin at October 15, 2004 02:00 PM

Great piece! I liked it so much I not only linked to it, I put you on my blogroll.

Posted by: Steve Teeter at October 17, 2004 10:01 AM

> They ask me "why dont Americans care what the world thinks?"

There's another big reason. It's not that we don't care, it's that we don't agree, and see no benefit in agreeing with folks who are fairly consistently wrong.

Harsh you say? Well, we've noticed that whenever most of the rest of the world disagrees with most of the US, it's likely that the rest of the world is wrong.

Posted by: Andy Freeman at October 25, 2004 04:13 PM

      Marvelous essay, Varifrank.  I'll send it to several of my friend.

      And if I'm still around fifty years from now, when western Europe collapses into a part of Islam, I'll give it to the refugees to help them start the orientaion process.

      Note to self: immigration reform, get working on immediately.  Hordes of Euro-socialists will be trying to sneak across the border!

Posted by: Stephen M. St. Onge at October 26, 2004 01:33 AM

Your article contains many interesting truths, such as you view on the American political system, its effect on international treaties, and how it is all misunderstood by many non-Americans. However, it's a pity that a lot of your message gets lost in stereotypes.

You claim that no European could ever understand Americans and yet, that what makes your country great is that foreigners, such as Europeans, can come over and become part of America. I agree with the second part: a lot of immigrants have become very succesful Americans and that is part of what makes your country great. Surely, they have been foreigners that "get it".

And that's symptomatic of a broader problem with your article. You make value judgements about the ignorance of all "Europeans" based on your own conversations with them about something you understand very well. When "Europeans" (if there even is such a thing as a "European") talk to Amercans about specific European countries, they'll often find a lot of misunderstandings and misconceptions as well. Sadly, some of these "Europeans" conclude that that makes Americans ignorant. I'd argue that such conclusions say more about these "Europeans" and their culture than it says about Americans. Similarly, your article reveals more about you and your culture than it does about so-called Europeans.

Posted by: Jim Keps at October 26, 2004 07:14 AM

How much is it reasonable to expect for someone living in a smaller, less powerful country to know about the greatest power of his time? How many countries have educational/media systems that teach to that level today?

Why isn't anybody asking these questions? Why aren't surveys being run that highlight the islands of ignorance about the US?

Posted by: TM Lutas at October 26, 2004 09:39 AM

Yes, one might well be confused about the difference between Finland and Norway.

That's less significant than being confused by the difference between northern and southern Illinois.

Posted by: Andy Freeman at October 27, 2004 08:37 AM

Great piece and I wish we could all start writing things like that on both sides of the pond (I'm born Canadian living in the UK). I just object to the “89%” comment someone posted, my family comes from Wales, and more than half my male ancestors died on ships in the merchant navy in two wars. It took a certain type of guts to board a ship on a convoy to Murmansk, when 19 out of 20 ships were being sunken en-route. Courage and conviction still exists over here even if we do not understand the meaning of soul!

Posted by: Miles Peters at October 28, 2004 12:14 AM

Oh please... Not only is the article a bunch of drivel, the author doesn't even know how to write proper English. "I'm hear to tell you" ??? This piece looks like it was written by a 3rd grader and then fed through a (poor) spell checker.

And I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't want the guy with his finger on the bomb to be a beer-drinking gut-busting good ol' boy. That thought alone is scarier than all the horror movies ever released from Hollywood. The President of the most powerful nation in the world needs to be held to a higher standard, we as a nation cannot afford for him to be "one of us" - he has to be better, Much better than the average Joe, because he has to stand up to much bigger, harder problems than the average Joe.

I can't believe all mindless the fawning over this crap. You talk about ignorance abroad, and don't see the devastating ignorance right here in front of you. Wake up, people!

Posted by: Howard Chu at October 28, 2004 12:14 AM

Great article, but to me it seems to be mostly good for Americans themselves. I see lots of reactions from Americans that can identify with your article.

As for Europeans, I don't identify as "European" myself. I think of myself as Dutch, from the little Country in Europe with Amsterdam as capital. The country where we have legalised use of soft drugs and prostitution, where we have a law for Euthinasia and where you will more likely be booked from speeding then for steeling a bike (Zero Tolerance). One thing we might have in common is that we welcome most foreigners. In fact, lots of Turkish, Maroccan people have already done so.

My problem with your article is that you identify the problem to be 'misinformation' or 'ignorance' as a cause of the problem. To remedy this, you have written some items that could make people learn something about the US. And I did learn something, but I did not feel closer to the American people. This mostly was caused by your ignorance about people outside of the US, one of the principles the article starts with.

Your consistant use of "Europeans" where you probably know that those people don't identify that way, combined with some of the generalisation s, fail to appail to me. If you are the most outward interested american, there is a problem there. There are people in Spain that refuse to identify themselves as spanish, because they are catalan or Basque. And they have been for centuries.

You stated the unbelieve some have when they learn that almost nothing is older then 50 years in the US. I think some americans will be equally impressed by some of the historic monuments in Europe. Places that have clearly be inhabited for 1000s of years. And then I don't mean the big cities with the well known monuments, but the small villages in the countryside, each with its own 11th century church.

Our differences are plentifull and our common misconceptions and ignorances are as well. To get closer together we both need to change. Your article, while learning a thing or two about america, does nothing to bring us closer together. You claim your article is written for Europeans, but most of them will feel alienated by your article. So maybe a new one can be made which does bring us closer together? A twosided view of our most blatant ignorances that addresses those in a language we can all identify with?

Your article was good, but especially when I look at the responses, I only feel us drifting further apart.

Hans

Posted by: HHouwaard at October 28, 2004 12:27 AM

Interesting article, but I'd like to point out one inaccuracy:

"the NY Police Department has 40,000 police officers, 250 helicopters and 50 aircraft and 125 large boats which is almost bigger than the largest army in Europe or nearly all the rest, combined!"

The German and French armies number over 200,000 personnel each, and the British army over 100,000. Take a look at this chart for some figures from 1998.

If you're lecturing people for their ignorance it pays to get your own facts right.

Posted by: Mark B at October 28, 2004 03:51 AM

fantastic post - well written and articulated. really does go a long way in explaining what goes on in the head of an American.

We need more posts like that, so that both Europeans and Americans can understand each other....

Posted by: Euro blogger at October 28, 2004 08:04 AM

The only secret in Secret Weapon is the fact that you were a righty. You could have saved a lot of time by just saying that up front.

Many of the things you claimed were great about this country like the separation of powers is really no longer in effect. We are governed by fiat. The Repubs rubber stamp the president. But, mostly, the president does whatever he wants without consequence.

I suppose that could make him like us, but we have to live with the consequences. He doesn't.

Anyway, America is a much lessor place, because Bush was president.

Posted by: David Locke at October 28, 2004 02:32 PM


A few replies, and thanks for pointing out how completely correct Verifrank is on this one:

>> "The President of the most powerful nation in
>> the world needs to be held to a higher
>> standard..."

Q. Where was this elitist attitude when "Slick Willie" Clinton was in office?

A. It's no more correct now than it was then (when folks on the left used it as an excuse for him).

>> As for Europeans, I don't identify as
>> European myself.

a.k.a., Why The European Union Will Fail.

>> we have to live with the consequences.
>> He doesn't.

Yes he does, *all* Americans live with the consequences. Apparently you missed a major point of this article.

--Fuzzy

Posted by: Fuzzy at October 29, 2004 04:24 PM

Very well said and written. I will simply and emphatically say "Amen."

Posted by: Tonya Hyche at October 30, 2004 06:48 PM

Well, though I am a European I hope my oppinion is of interest here, either.
One should tend to treat the truth and not spread out populism en grande. One of your own writers, Solomon Tulbure, spoke out the truth: America no longer has the government the founding fathers intended it to be.
Read that before hailing inconsequence.

Posted by: The Mike at October 31, 2004 04:49 AM

Hear ,hear . Well spoken but are you sure that the values you espouse are best reflected in George Bush . Maybe I fool myself in believing that I understand Americans , believing as I do that the roots of American liberty were planted in England , a understanding of rights derived out of the Anglo-Saxon common law , that an individual has the freedom to do anything that does not endanger the freedom of another , that anything not proscribed by law is legal .After all Thomas Paine was an Englishman .

So when it is that I find fault in Americans , in American foreign policy and American Presidents it is not by some "Euro" standard that I judge but by the high ideals and standards by which the United States was founded .

What would the founding fathers thought of the imprisonment without trial of Gauntanamo detainees , the indefinate interrment of individuals contrary to International treaties made in good faith . What would they make of the detention of individuals based entirely on hearsay evidence , with those detained unable to hear what they have been accused of without being able to face their accusers , trials based on evidence produced under duress and torture .

What would be their reaction to the rewarding of ambassadorships and government jobs to campaign fund managers . The gilding of the nests of friends and associates from public funds . The attempted imposition of the religous and moral beliefs of a vocal and well funded part of the population on another .

Eisenhower rightly pulled the plug on the British and French when they engineered a war with Eygpt to protect their strategic and economic interests . Yet the suspicion is that the war in Iraq is an attempt to secure the long term economic and energy security of the USA by seizing control of the Iraqi oil fields , and even if this may not be true the suspicion is damaging in itself .

Its harder to blame Bush and his cohorts of basing their planning for the war in Iraq and its aftermath on wishful thinking . All politicians of whatever ilk and nation are prone to that disease . But if you must exercise your military might you better be sure you put someone in the Whitehouse who either knows what he's doing or is willing to let your Generals do the job.

In the end the US cannot continue to see the world merely in terms of its own interests , as rivals to be isolated as markets to be opened , resources to be exploited . That is exactly how the British Empire behaved and for all its power and wealth it made to many enemies , alienated too many would be friends to survive . Only by respecting and cherishing the freedom rights and aspirations of other nations and peoples can any nation hope to have its own respected .

Posted by: cetot at October 31, 2004 06:17 AM

@Oscar
I am absolutely sure that tehre is a great difference between Europe in the 70's and today. I only can say it again: Read Solomon Tulbure and do not hail populism and empty phrases.
The time where the goverment was exactly what the Founding Fathers ment it to be, are over since a very long time.

Posted by: The Mike at October 31, 2004 07:17 AM

As a native Swiss I understand the greatness of the political system in the US well. Ours is similar in many respects (separation of power, etc) and better in others (many issues are decided in public votes, we vote 4-5 times a year).

Switzerland is not part of the European Union because the people voted 'No', against the intentions of the government. This despite the geographical situation (surrounded by the UE). The mayor reason is that the Swiss don't want to give up independence and decisive power to an external entity. This was the reason also Switzerland only joined the UN two years ago, despite Geneva, Switzerland beeing official headquarters.

However, what I don't understand is how half of the american population can support George W. Bush when this candidate and his administration is lying and cheating whenever necessary to help their personal goals and financial benefit.
There seems do be double standard. Bill Clinton was harrassed for years because of an event which, while not glorious, were only of his concern. George W. Bush can get away with flagrant lies and taking the country into a war which serves only his and his friends philosophical and financial gains.
Markus

Posted by: Markus at October 31, 2004 08:24 AM

"I never think you should judge any country by its politics. After all, we English are quite honest by nature, aren't we?" --Miss Froy in The Lady Vanishes (1938)

Posted by: Anton Sherwood at November 6, 2004 08:04 PM

If only our President were as articulate as you!

Posted by: Achilz at December 2, 2004 05:27 PM

Thank you for the post. I had not thought much about the ways in which the U.S. was mis-perceived, but it makes sense that ignorance on the European side of the pond may have something to do with some of the comments coming from over there. On the other hand, some of the posts here are pretty standard LLL (looney liberal left) drivel, even when written by people in Europe, so even if America was understood better, I'm not sure it'd make a difference.

Still my best friend is a Chilean who used to spout anti-Americanisms but came here and after years of mixed experiences (some good some bad) gets very annoyed at her countrymen who criticize the U.S. Understanding through experience has led to a staunch supporter of America (though not of President Bush). Not that I'm suggesting we import a bunch of people living in Europe (heaven forfend that I use the word "European"!). :-D

Posted by: Michelle at December 4, 2004 07:26 PM