Varifrank: Im going down a real bad path here, but bear with me

Im going down a real bad path here, but bear with me

I'm not much for conspiracy theories, but I'm increasingly finding myself thinking that Democrats are capable of anything and I do mean anything to win.

Is it too hard to believe that they would stoop to sabotaging the market to win the election? Its revolting, but the more I think about it, the more evidence I see. And trust me, its not something I want to see. I've spent the afternoon trying to figure out why Nancy Pelosi acted the way she did with this vote. Things are kind of convoluted in congress but sometimes the best way to kill a bill is to make it so distasteful that even its supporters wont vote for it. If you have the President come out and say that something is necessary and needs to be done right away, but you spend all your time 'poisoning the well', all you have done is insure in a very backhanded wsay that nothing will be done. You can flap your arms and say you tried real hard, but what the President said he wanted to do is going down in flames. It's going down in flames not because it isn't actually necessary but because some people want to see Bush lose.

Here's the sad thing. Bush didn't lose 1.1 TRILLION dollars today, you did.

But heres the thing that bothers me. Since 2006, Democrat leadership in the legislature have demonstrably:

1. Tried sabotage the American Military so that it would be seen to lose
in Iraq.

2. Deny Americans access to their own oil.

3. Destroy the American Financial System. They spent three months
telling us we were dead certain in a recession earlier this year. We
weren't. What they seem to have learned is that they needed to go
further in the effort to scare the living bejeebus out of you.

4. Do we all remember Senator Chuck Schumer and his role the Indymac bank failure? I'm wondering how many bank failures have started because of "whispering campaigns". How many banks were shorted because of an engineered effort to cause the bank to crash?

To what benefit? None of this to benefits America or the American People. Its not as part of an idealogical dispute, but purely to benefit the Democrats. This is just wrong. You "don't like Bush" in fact you hate him, ok, I get that, but you don't burn down the house just to get rid of the sofa.

I cannot get past the idea that the Democrats have engineered this whole scene and that is a very bad thing to believe.

In this election with this track history, are we really ready to give
them the legislature AND the Executive Branch as a reward?

Posted @ September 29, 2008 04:22 PM | Current Affairs

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://varifrank.com/MT/mt-tb.cgi/1150

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Im going down a real bad path here, but bear with me:

» I Am Become Soros--Destroyer Of Financial Worlds! from Ed Driscoll.com
Mike Huckabee and blogger Frank Martin each question the timing of the markets' current meltdown. Oracle's Larry Ellison has the right business mindset for a time like this, and as far as conspiracy theories, for the moment, I agree with... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2008 05:27 PM

This is the last election.

Posted by: Ham Burger at September 29, 2008 07:08 PM

I'm not sure it's intentional as a plan because it would have taken a heck of a lot of thought-very difficult---I do believe the far left is capable of just taking things issue by issue and trying to blame everything no matter what the subject on the Repubs, McC, and Bush. It's like-engage not the mind or integrity... go for the end game, we need to win at any price-the truth be damned is the theme. You know what I think-they may get by with it-they (the dems and MSM) may shove this green, untried guy through-but the truth will out in the end-it always does.

Posted by: theresa at September 29, 2008 08:39 PM

re "truth will out in the end - it always does": true, but will it out before the election (as i pray) or only eventually in some 25th century history book?

Posted by: hatless in hattiesburg at September 30, 2008 11:09 AM

How does the phrase go?

"Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity"

Posted by: Vootie at September 30, 2008 02:03 PM

If I was a conspiracy theory buff, I would raise the question: "Soros?"

But, I'm more inclined to Vootie's thesis, with amplification by Charles Krauthammer:

"Krauthammer's razor (with apologies to Occam):
In explaining any puzzling Washington phenomenon,
always choose stupidity over conspiracy, incompetence over cunning.
Anything else gives them too much credit." ~ Charles Krauthammer

Posted by: Paul Gordon at September 30, 2008 07:14 PM

BTW, since we lost 1.1 trillion yesterday, but the market is back up by 485 pts today, does that mean we *made* 687 billion today?

Not bad for a single day's work, is it?

:oP

Posted by: Vootie at October 1, 2008 02:40 AM

I am to the point were I do believe the democrat leadership is really EVIL . Silly I know , but I really do believe that .

Posted by: Jacko at October 1, 2008 02:19 PM

Their prime motivator is power, I firmly believe that. They want power over as much of everybody and everything that they can. That's what happens when you think you are the best and the brightest - you feel you are owed the chance to rule, and in your pride and arrogance, there is no "brake" or moderation. (I also believe that's a symptom of failing to acknowledge a Higher Power, but that's a discussion for another day, perhaps.)

Their moralisty is that of the old Bolsheviks: Whatever is required to achieve power is "moral." That means lying, cheating, stealing, and - if it comes down to this - killing. I would not put that past a group whose idol is Saul Alinsky, (whose idol was, lest we forget, Lucifer.)

And Ham Burger may be right: Should they "win" (or steal) this election, do not think it impossible that future elections will be suspended because of some "security issue," or some other concocted excuse. They are nakedly lusting after power to control, and when you're that that invested in your cause, they won't let a little thing like "The Law" or "Ethics" or "Morality" get in the way.

Prepare for a rough 30-day slogfest, and then prepare for a culture war like nothing you've ever seen, win or lose in November.

Posted by: Dan at October 1, 2008 06:08 PM

Here, Frank. You might find this of interest in this light.

Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis

I'm not a fan of conspiracy theories, but this gives your surmission a leg or two to stand on.

Posted by: Vootie at October 2, 2008 08:33 PM