Question of the day

My father once said that the most magnificent thing about the Nixon Administration was that an entire goverment was removed from power by nothing but the simple rule of law and not a single tank or military division was ordered to be moved in support of the President as he was removed from office. This act, and its reponse by the powers of all of the various area of Government as well as both political parties, he felt, was all that really separated us from the other Democracies in the world. At the end of the day, Richard Nixon was just a man and no man was above the law.

Question of the Day -

All Presidents face executive challenges and all Presidents can and do make errors, some of the errors they perform might even fall into the area of 'crimes and misdemeanors'. The Constitution offers a remedy to the Republic for this problem via the legislative branch, which is known as "Impeachment".

Yet, given the volitile state of politics in this country, is it at all possible that 'President Obama' could plausibly face impeachment at some point in the future?

Extra Credit - What happens to the Republic if such a thing were to actually occur?

Posted @ October 26, 2008 03:49 PM | Current Affairs

Trackbacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://varifrank.com/MT/mt-tb.cgi/1184

Comments

> Yet, given the volitile state of politics in this country, is it at all possible that 'President Obama' could plausibly face impeachment at some point in the future?

Relatively unlikely given the rabidity with which the Left defends itself.

You'd have to:
a) Get a GOP Congress
b) Have some damned inviolable evidence -- something like unassailable videotape of Obama doing something truly egregious -- like agreeing with Ayers that the USA needs to be destroyed and setting out plans for doing it.

I'd put the chances at something resembling "zero" and "almost zero". The media will, in the meantime, act as Democratic party shills doing everything possible to distract and obfuscate.

I agree with you Frank, as far as the remarkability of the history of this Nation -- we are, in fact, the oldest major government on the planet which has not radically altered its form since we created ourselves in our modern form in 1789, with the Constitution. The closest comparative is the UK, which shifted from a total monarchy to a parliamentary figurehead monarchy in the early 1800s. Every other single nation of any significance has had radical restructuring since then -- usually revolutions, sometimes externally forced alterations (Nazi Germany, Japan), but not one existed in anything even vaguely resembling its current form in 1789.

In that time we've had three major crises -- the Civil War, the Nixon Resignation, and The 2000 Election. And two of those times, the system, reflecting upon its people, did its job smoothly and effectively.

I'm curious if we aren't about to have another. The efforts of the Obama camp to steal this are going to be... interesting.

Posted by: Vootie at October 26, 2008 06:50 PM

if he's impeached, he stands trial in front of the Senate.

if the Senate does not convict, nothing happens other than an embarrassing situation.

if your question is,if Barry H. Obama was to be found guilty in an impeachment proceeding, Joe the fisherman Biden becomes the POTUS.

yes, that Joe. the one who apparently love fishing so much, he has a gaffe for a mouth.

Posted by: roberto at October 26, 2008 07:18 PM

I'd doubt that Obama could ever be impeached - regardless of what he did or how corrupt he became. Think FDR, his attempt to pack the Supreme Court with his cronies and how he wasn't impeached for that abuse of the Constitution.

Assassination would be more likely. And no, I don't advocate that and would discourage anyone from doing that.

Posted by: Dr. Bob at October 27, 2008 09:34 PM

edited slightly for content there Dr. Bob...

Posted by: Frank Martin at October 27, 2008 10:45 PM

if he's impeached, he stands trial in front of the Senate.

And it won't matter which party holds the majority in that chamber, they will not vote to convict. It could be 100 Republicans who were known for hard-line law-and-order, my-country-right-or-wrong views before going to the Senate, and you still wouldn't find the necessary 67 votes to convict. I'd even bet against 51 votes.

Part of the orientation for freshman Senators is castration, followed by a lobotomy.

Posted by: McGehee at October 28, 2008 12:35 PM

Post a Comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?